The Prayas ePathshala

Exams आसान है !

02 July 2024 – The Indian Express

Facebook
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

New guidelines by the International Cricket Council 

Introduction:

  • Regardless of any surgery or gender reassignment treatment they may have received, new ICC regulations prohibit players who have gone through puberty and transitioned from male to female from competing in international women’s matches.

The reasoning for the ICC’s ruling:

  • The following guidelines, listed in priority order by the ICC, form the foundation of the rules: “protection of the integrity of the women’s game, safety, fairness, and inclusion.”
  • The argument against transgender athletes participating in women’s sports is centred on the physical advantages they are said to have from going through male puberty, including increased lung capacity, stronger bones, and more lean muscle mass.
  • The matter cannot be considered resolved, nevertheless, because there is a dearth of study comparing transgender athletes’ actual pre- and post-transition performance.
  • Open categories for trans athletes have been introduced by several sporting bodies, most notably in swimming, to circumvent the issue; nevertheless, additional research on the science of gender and its relationship to sports, as well as more nuanced policies, would be necessary for a long-term solution.

 Justifications for prohibiting transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports:

  • Fairness: Proponents of the prohibition contend that because transgender women have physical traits that emerge during male puberty, such as muscular strength, bone density, and lung capacity, they have an unfair advantage over cisgender women. They contend that permitting transgender women to participate in women’s sports will disadvantage and make it more challenging for cisgender women to achieve success.
  • Preserving the integrity and equity of women’s sports: Some contend that prohibiting transgender athletes from participating in these activities is essential. They contend that permitting transgender women to compete would cause a drop in the number of female athletes since these women might be deterred from competing if they feel they are in a disadvantageous situation.
  • Legal challenges: Another worry is that permitting transgender people to play women’s sports may give rise to lawsuits from cisgender women who feel that their rights are being violated.
  • Justifications opposing the exclusion of transgender athletes from women’s sports:
  • Inclusion: Those who oppose a ban contend that barring transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports is discriminatory and exclusive. They contend that it should be acceptable for transgender women to participate in sports that correspond with their gender identity.
  • Medical interventions: Some contend that transgender women do not unfairly benefit from hormone therapy or other medical procedures that lower their testosterone levels in comparison to cisgender women. They contend that by using these actions, the playing field can be successfully levelled.
  • Lack of evidence: The idea that transgender women unfairly have an edge over cisgender women in all sports is not well-supported by scientific data. While some studies have found no discernible differences, others have suggested that transgender women might have an advantage in sports like running.

The ICC’s regulations and the inclusion issue:

  • The International Olympic Committee’s historic 2004 decision to permit transgender athletes to compete in the Olympics highlights the conundrum that sports organisations worldwide have been facing.
  • As gender becomes less binary in general, exclusion cannot coexist with fairness in sports, which is a crucial component of the highly regarded quality known as sportsmanship.

Conclusion:

  • There are no simple solutions to the complex problem of transgender athletes in women’s sports. Both sides of the debate have compelling points, so it’s critical to weigh them thoroughly before choosing a course of action. Stated differently, how much longer would a transgender person be forced to suffer through the devastating decision of choosing to affirm their identity over participating in a sport they love?

Select Course